What is the difference between a systematic review and a scoping review?
Answer
Scoping reviews aim to fine out the extent of the literature on a topic, determining what evidence is and is not available. They may have a broader focus than a systematic review. A scoping review follows the same methods as a systematic review, but does not require a risk of bias assessment because of the different goals.
See a comparison chart on our Systematic Review Service guide.
Learn more:
- Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143.
- Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467-473. doi:10.7326/M18-0850
- Current Best Practices for the Conduct of Scoping Reviews (May 12, 2016)
- The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual 2015. Methodology for JBI Scoping Reviews
Links & Files
- MSK Systematic Review Service
- What is a systematic review?
- What is the difference between a literature review and a systematic review?
- What is a systematic review protocol? Do I need one?
- Does the Library offer any systematic review tools or software?
- How can I request to work with a librarian on my systematic review?
- Does the Library offer classes in conducting systematic reviews?
- How do I know if there’s already a systematic review on my topic?
FAQ Topics
Comments (0)
Contact Us
